Date: 2010-11-15 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skurtchasor.livejournal.com
As much as this is welcome news, the author's (of the article, not the actual study) egregious misuse of statistics makes me want to bang my head violently against a nearby hard surface. Because everybody knows that sample proportion equals population proportion, right? Now it just so happens that I'm in the middle of writing a Stat exam about confidence intervals and hypothesis testing, but that's beside the point.

I'm assuming the actual study won't make a claim as ridiculous as "lesbians don't beat or molest their kids." Not with a sample size of 78, anyway.

Date: 2010-11-17 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lady-ganesh.livejournal.com
This. Like Tiggy, this info doesn't surprise me, but I'm always leery when someone claims any population is immune from abuse.

Date: 2010-11-18 02:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arafel.livejournal.com
True. As has been mentioned previously, the sample size is too small. I liked the spirit of the article, though.

Profile

moonwise: (Default)
moonwise

January 2020

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 15th, 2026 04:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios